home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: newshub.cts.com!usenet
- From: pwright@crash.cts.com (Phil Wright)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: Authorized Dealer List 2-29-96
- Date: 4 Mar 1996 01:32:42 GMT
- Organization: CTS Network Services
- Message-ID: <1126.6636T950T2021@crash.cts.com>
- References: <31363883.2AB1@interramp.com> <392.6634T542T1743@crash.cts.com> <4hbh4i$t0d@daily-planet.execpc.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: gargoyle.cts.com
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP)
-
-
- On 03-Mar-96 12:18:42, Jonathan Gapen was reported to have said:
- >In article <392.6634T542T1743@crash.cts.com> pwright@crash.cts.com (Phil
- >Wright) writes:
- >> On 01-Mar-96 04:36:35, SMG / InTouch System was reported to have said:
- >>
- >> >JTJTi Interactive Oceanside CA USA 632-844-5731
- >> >*
- >>
- >> I live in Oceanside. The area code is 619. I don't think 632 is even a
- >> valid area code. Looks like a couple dealers got mixed together.
-
- > Just as example, Lake Havasu, AZ got bumped out of area code 602 by
- >Phoenix, so Utilities Unlimited is now in the 520 area code. It's
- >entirely possible that Oceanside is now in the 632 area code, or parts of
- >it.
-
- Hmm. Thought I sent that through Email but in any case...
-
- As I said above, I live in Oceanside. It is all 619 area code. There have
- been a lot of area code changes lately but so far they haven't hit us.
-
- Yes, I was aware that they had to start using more than 0 and 1 for the
- middle digit of the area codes but I didn't realize they were using the
- full range 0-9.
-
- According to AT&T, 632 is not a valid area code.
-
- pwright@crash.cts.com
-
-